Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Britain Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimous consensus that the company does not deserve its own article, and no suitable merge target has been identified. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Little Britain Productions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable holding company only known for producing a limited number of programmes. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of notability. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep as per sources 1, 2, 3 and 4. This article has only been nominated due to Little Britain being pulled from BBC Iplayer and Netflix. –Davey2010^Talk 17:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- These are all passing mentions, they do not indicate notability. It’s been on my list for some time actually, and has been tagged as a potential notability concern since August 2012. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - ~~Most production companies don't have great sourcing however notability is most certainly there, Certainly meets BASIC. –Davey2010^Talk 01:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]
Delete - Admittedly the sources provided weren't great, Merging is rather pointless too, Having done a deeper search I wasn't able to find anything source-wise, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I have added a few refs but to be honest not enough for own page. Best merging to Little Britain.User:Davidstewartharvey

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Article is not properly written. No proper sources and citations. Ashishkafle (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Come Fly with Me. Despite the name of the company, they did not produce Little Britain, so it would be inappropriate to merge them into that article. Come Fly with Me, which was very popular (7-12 million viewers) and seems to have been their main project, could have a paragraph or sentence mentioning the production company. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 11:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not inherited, we need references. Merging doesn't make sense, at best it would be a mention-in-passing in another article. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.